Comment Number: 05-02582-EREG-114-d7391-c32170
Received: 3/6/2005 8:00:00 AM
Subject: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Request for Comment
Title: National Security Personnel System
CFR Citation: 5 CFR Chapter XCIX and Part 9901
No Attachments

Comments:

Subpart B  Classification

Page 7579
General - The classification system described in Subpart B of this proposed regulation contains very few specific details about the career groups, pay schedules, pay bands, and other classification structures and rules that will apply to DoD employees under this regulation, if implemented. Much more detail is needed to allow for a meaningful and thorough review and discussion of this regulation, as required by law.
No changes should be made to the classification systems currently used by DoD agencies until a full comment and review period is completed, followed by a full collective bargaining process with the unions representing DoD employees.
A personnel system without fair and appropriate classification structures and rules will be rejected by employees, and will result in distrust of management, decreased morale, and lower productivity, ultimately harming national security.

Page 7579
Section 9901.222 Reconsideration of classification decisions
9901.222(b) states: DoD will establish implementing issuances for reviewing requests for reconsideration.
This process has not been defined, so there is no way to determine if it will be fair, effective and credible. This process should have been defined in these regulations to allow for a meaningful review and comment period, as required by law.
No changes should be made to the current reconsideration process used by DoD employees until a full comment and review period is completed, followed by a full collective bargaining process with the unions representing DoD employees.
A system without a fair and credible reconsideration procedure will be rejected by employees, and will result in distrust of management, decreased morale, and lower productivity, ultimately harming national security.

Although the proposed regulation allows an employee to request reconsideration of the assignment of his or her position to an occupational series, career group, pay system, pay schedule or pay band, there is no independent review of this determination. The absence of an independent review and appeal procedure will undermine the credibility and accountability of these determinations. This section should be modified to allow employees to challenge classification determinations through the negotiated grievance procedure.

9901.222(e) states that reconsideration determinations made under this section will be based on criteria issued by DoD, unless DoD has adopted an applicable OPM classification standard. The use of criteria issued solely by DoD, in lieu of an OPM standard or criteria, will likely be considered unfair by employees. Only criteria and standards issued by OPM should be used in reconsideration determinations made by DoD under this section.




Sample Comments on NSPS Regulations
Subpart D - Performance Management

Page 7585
Section 9901.403 Waivers
I oppose the waiver of 5 U.S.C. chapter 43 and 5 CFR part 430, which provide important criteria, standards and procedures governing the performance management system. No compelling need to eliminate these provisions has been presented, which protect employees from arbitrary and unfair treatment in the evaluation of their performance.
Relaxing the standards for management to conduct employee evaluations and set performance standards will not enhance national security. This will only lead to greater uncertainty about what is expected of employees, resulting in misunderstandings, disruptions, and inefficiencies in performance.

Page 7585
Section 9901.405 Performance management system requirements
9901.405(a) states: DoD will issue implementing issuances that establish a performance management system for DoD employees, subject to the requirements set forth in this subpart.
System has not been defined, so there is no way to determine if it will be fair, effective/credible. Process should have been defined in these regulations to allow meaningful determininations.