Comment Number: EM-019876
Received: 3/11/2005 5:49:14 PM
Subject: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Request for Comment
Title: National Security Personnel System
CFR Citation: 5 CFR Chapter XCIX and Part 9901
No Attachments

Comments:

March 11, 2005 DoD NSPS Comments, DoD NSPS Comments: I write to convey my concerns about the planned National Security Personnel System (NSPS) rules, listed in the Federal Register on February 14, 2005. I have worked for DOD for over two years and served my country for twenty; I am deeply concerned about maintaining fair and effective workplaces in the department. I would like to comment particularly on Subpart C, Section on setting pay of the regulations. I am concerned that this change will be highly detrimental to the DOD because of the following points: If you proceed with the Setting Pay to be determined by management you could cause a well trained and good employee to be shortchanged, and lead them into thinking that they are not valued within their organization, which could lower their performance and affect the Mission goals. Using Setting Pay to be determined by management can also be affected by the good old boy system. If a manager does not like a certain employee, he or she can have a great impact on their pay no matter how good or how well trained they are; that employee?s future will still fall in the hands of that type of a manager. Setting Pay to be determined by management could also cause resentment by an employee and jeopardize the relations within an organization. This type of action will cause the mission to fail or be delayed, and undermine National Security. I hope you will consider changing the proposed regulations so that all employees can be treated fair and equal, and by doing so will speed mission accomplishment, and provide stronger National Security. I am also angry that these proposals seem to treat the employees who help defend our country as the enemy. Most DoD employees work hard and are committed. I believe that mistreating the employees will hurt the agency?s mission. I am very upset by NSPS. This system will change the way workers are paid, evaluated, promoted, fired, scheduled, and treated. These rules would create a system in which federal managers are influenced by favoritism rather than serving the civil concerns of the American people. Annual Pay Raises Under the General Schedule and FWS, employee pay was clear. It was funded by Congress and could not be taken away. However, NSPS will take away this certainty. Salaries and bonuses are funded by DoD. In the past ? as recently as just last year ? DoD did not fund its awards program. Given the agency?s miserable record on this issue, how can employees feel confident that our salaries and bonuses will be funded in the future? ?Friend of the Supervisor? Pay System With the new patronage pay system, which DoD calls ?pay for performance,? the amount of a worker's salary will depend almost completely on the personal judgment of his or her manager. This system will force workers to compete with one another for pay raises, which will destroy teamwork, increase conflict among employees, and reward short-term outcomes. There is no guarantee that even the best workers will receive a pay raise or that the pay offered will be fair or competitive. This system will create a situation in which workers are in conflict with one another and afraid to speak out about harassment, violations of the law, and workplace safety problems. Furthermore, there will be no impartial appeal system to assure that everyone is treated fairly. Schedules and Overtime NSPS will allow managers to schedule employees to work without sufficient advance notice of schedule changes. This will make it extremely difficult for working parents to care for their children and family. It will also mean that abusive managers could harass employees with bad schedules or short notice. Overtime rotations can be canceled, which means that employees may not be able to plan adequately for childcare and other important responsibilities. Civilian Deployment Federal employees could be assigned anywhere in the world, even into a war zone, with little or no notice. I am proud to serve my country but I am also responsible for caring for my family and my personal obligations at home. We signed up for a civilian job. We did not enlist in the military. Today?s volunteer system works well. America is at war. We are fighting for democracy abroad. But the regulations are an attack on workers? basic rights. Furthermore, NSPS will divert the attention of defense workers from the soldiers? welfare to protecting themselves from abuse on the job. I urge you to force DoD to rethink this proposal. We need work rules that preserve fairness, serve the American people, and respect the rights of Defense Department workers. Sincerely,