| Comment Number: | OL-10503085 |
| Received: | 3/4/2005 3:48:15 AM |
| Subject: | Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Request for Comment |
| Title: | National Security Personnel System |
| CFR Citation: | 5 CFR Chapter XCIX and Part 9901 |
| No Attachments |
Comments:
The National Security Mission can not meet any requirments when discuraging employees by changing their pay, leave, job tital, or any other benafits given the federal government employee. Rigid Inflexible rules hold the Department of Defense back. I have not yet seen any rule or regulation that stoped the government from doing what they wanted! As for hiring be slow, how can the gonernment by pass a, "Indepth Background Investigation" with compermiseing the National Security? And most jobs that require a High leval security clearence take the most time when setting on a desk for more more then a week. "Angile & Responsive" thies meen to down size when ever the government wants. It also lets supervisors keep friends how are nonpreductive and discharge others they do not like even if that employee is disabled, or to old, has a religion not liked be that supervisor, or is the wrong gender! You expect a lot when you have supervisors how use the "Merit System Principles" to advince their favorit employees, and worst stop highly productive employees because of thier adituide. And because the pay will be governed by thies same supervisors, it will easier for thies same nondroductive employees to meet the Merit System for all pay raises! So by changing the system you still keep nonproductive employees, hire lower quality employees because of lower pay csales, find it harder to meet deadlines, and permote more military bases to close. Good Thinking ! Bad Idea !