| Comment Number: | OL-10512182 |
| Received: | 3/16/2005 11:13:41 PM |
| Subject: | Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Request for Comment |
| Title: | National Security Personnel System |
| CFR Citation: | 5 CFR Chapter XCIX and Part 9901 |
| No Attachments |
Comments:
I beleive the porposed NSPS regulation will undermine the civil service and hurt the ability of DoD employees to accomplish th agency's mission. Plesas consider the following comments and delay final implementation until the proper steps have been taken to effectively involve the elected representatives of Defense Department workers. Subpart B Classification- Section 9901.201 to 99901.231 NSPS will replace the current government job classifications by grouping them into a few occupational categories with pay being set in "bands" with the new categories. Individual duties under the revised categories to a neutral artitrator. Subpart C Pay Sections 9901.301 to 9901.373 Defense Department employees and NAF employees should continue to receive the same annual pay and across-the-board adjustment that the GS/FWS workers receive. The individual pay increases for performance in the regulation should include guaranteed percentages so employees will understand the pay system and what their pay increase will be depending on their performance. Subpart D Performance Management-9901.4010 - 9901.409 To ensure fairness and accuracy, Defense Department employes and Nonappropriated Fund Employees should be able to appeal any performance ration to an independent grievance and arbitration process as they do now. Subpart E Staffing and Employment-9901.501 to 9901.516 The proposed regulation would replace longstanding provisions of hiring found in 5 U.S.C Chapter 31 and d33 with unpublished procedures that will be prescribed at some future date through implementing issuances. Using this approach will allow th Defense Department to arbitrarily develop and administer new rules on staffing and employment that have not been available for public comment. This is especially troubling given the proposal to engate in non-citizen hiring to position within NSPS. Our national securaity would surely be put at risk if Defense Department managers were able to exercise such hiring flexibilities. Subpart F Workforce Shaping- 9901.6012 to 9901.611 The Defense Department should not change the current layoff/RIF rules but however should change teh BBA under NAF. Nonappropriated Fund Employees should be put under the Layoff/RIF rules, which gives balanced credit to performance and the employees' valuable years of committed service. Moreover , under the proposed regulation employment disputes over such matters wuld be unfairly linited to the Merit Systems Protection Board. Subpart G Adverse Action -9901.701 to 9901.810 The NSPS guidiing principle on enhanced management flexibility wuld be undermined if the provision on mandatory removable offense is retained. Dure process and fairness demand that the independent body reviewing major suspensions and terminations be allowed to alter the proposed penalty if it deems the penaslty to be unreasonable. The current standards approved by the courts to guide such bodies should be continued. Subpart H Appeals- Section 9901.801 to 9901.810 Over 25 years worth of case law will be discarded, where those percedents conflict with NSPS. tHIS WILL ELIMINATE the use of the Douglas factors, which third parties used to mitigate or overturn agency-imposed penalities Subpart I Labor-Management Relations - 9901.901 to 9901.929 The labor-management law that has governed the employees' right to organize and engage in collective bargaining has worked well since 1978. There is no compelling reason to take away most of the collective bargaining rights or grievance rights. The Defense Department should not create a "COMPANY-DOMINATED dispute Board" Any dispute board must be jointly selected by management and the Union.